ConocoPhillips oil case of second instance upheld CNOOC is not liable for damages (video) govos

ConocoPhillips oil case of second instance upheld CNOOC not liable for ConocoPhillips to dividend cut oil prices fell on 29 September, Tianjin legal network reporter Zhang Chi in September 29th, the Tianjin Municipal Higher People’s Court of second instance verdict on the sea and 21 for liability disputes the appellant ConocoPhillips Company Limited, a Chinese the defendant Chinese CNOOC offshore pollution damage case, the judgment dismissed the appeal and upheld, and the law of the sea and other 21 people should be taken for the case acceptance fee shall be exempted. For sea 14 parties and the attorney, the attorney in court of ConocoPhillips and CNOOC in the sentence, which is the oil spills in Penglai 19-3 oilfield in the first series of case acceptance and make a final judgment of the case. June 2011, Bohai 19-3 oilfield, a major oil spill pollution accidents occurred in Penglai. The joint investigation team of the State Oceanic Administration, the Ministry of environmental protection, the Ministry of agriculture and other departments found that the company was fully responsible for the oil spill accident. In order to timely and effective recovery of the loss of fishermen breeding and marine ecological damage, the State Oceanic Administration, the Ministry of agriculture and other administrative departments to focus on the administrative coordination of the way, with the company to negotiate pollution compensation. After coordination, ConocoPhillips paid compensation compensation of 1 billion yuan, of which 731 million 500 thousand yuan for compensation from Leting County of Hebei Province, Suizhong County in Liaoning province to continuous coastal polluted "three areas" four county fishermen’s loss of breeding, but also paid for marine ecological damage compensation of 1 billion 683 million yuan. By the end of 2012, more than 4500 households affected by pollution affected by the administrative coordination, and received a compensation for the loss of aquaculture. For sea 21 farmers do not accept compensation for the administrative coordination, the oil spill to the sea cucumber aquaculture caused heavy losses on the grounds, bring a lawsuit to the Tianjin maritime court. Tianjin maritime court verdict that the accident of oil spill waters breeding sea Koelreuteria 21 farmers caused pollution, the breeding rights should be protected, ConocoPhillips shall bear the liability for compensation. CNOOC is not oil workers, pollution source does not control, does not assume liability to pay compensation. For sea 21 farmers shall bear the burden of proof on the degree of loss and the amount of the sea 21 farmers for the burden of proof has not reached full, determine the extent of the maritime court of Tianjin with the relevant evidence and the facts of the case, the pollution degree and the amount of comprehensive accreditation, according to administrative compensation standard discretion of Koelreuteria sea 21 farmers losses amounting to 1683464.4 yuan, and from the sea 21 Koelreuteria farmers should bear the cost of litigation. For sea 21 farmers refused to accept the verdict, an appeal. Two the Tianjin Municipal Higher People’s court verdict that the farming area of 21 farmers from the sea for Penglai 19-3 oil field oil spill pollution, ConocoPhillips shall bear the liability for compensation. The controversial focus of the case for the other 21, Luan. Farmers due to the loss of oil spill pollution and accidents suffered by the amount of. The Tianjin high court that the sea Koelreuteria 21 farmers to deal with the pollution degree and the amount of burden of proof. For sea 2.相关的主题文章: